A historical perspective of informed consent in clinical practice and research
References (22)
- Mohr v Williams, 104 NW 12...
- Pratt v Davis, 79 NE 562...
- Schloendorff v Society of New York Hospitals, 105 NE 92, 95...
- Salgo v Leland Stanford Jr University Board of Trustees, 317 P 2d 170...
- et al.
The patient professional relationship, in Health Law—Cases, Materials and Problems
- Canterbury v Spence, 464 F 2d 772, 776, 784 (DC Cir...
- Black's Law Dictionary. St Paul, MN, West Publishing, p...
Sharing authority: The willingness to treat
Code of Medical Ethics
Experimentation With Human Beings: The Authority of the Investigator, Subject, Professions, and State in the Human Experimentation Process
(1972)
Cited by (34)
The Assessment of Decisional Capacity
2011, Neurologic ClinicsCitation Excerpt :The main objective of informed consent is to protect a patient’s autonomy. There are 3 criteria that must be met for informed consent to be considered valid9: A physician must convey the details of the treatment or procedure, including the risks, benefits, and alternatives of the proposed treatment or procedure in an understandable manner
Obtaining informed consent for participation from cognitively impaired adults
2003, Journal of Wound, Ostomy and Continence NursingFrom Hippocrates to COVID-19: A bibliographic history of medicine
2023, From Hippocrates to COVID-19: A Bibliographic History of MedicineVoluntary Consent: Theory and Practice
2023, Voluntary Consent: Theory and PracticeWhen do nudges undermine voluntary consent?
2021, Philosophical Studies
Copyright © 1999 Published by Elsevier Inc.