Mechanical circulatory support
Long-term follow-up of thoratec ventricular assist device bridge-to-recovery patients successfully removed from support after recovery of ventricular function

https://doi.org/10.1016/S1053-2498(01)00408-9Get rights and content

Abstract

Background:

In certain forms of severe heart failure there is sufficient improvement in cardiac function during ventricular assist device (VAD) support to allow removal of the device. However, it is critical to know whether there is sustained recovery of the heart and long-term patient survival if VAD bridging to recovery is to be considered over the option of transplantation.

Methods:

To determine long-term outcome of survivors of VAD bridge-to-recovery procedures, we retrospectively evaluated 22 patients with non-ischemic heart failure successfully weaned from the Thoratec left ventricular assist device (LVAD) or biventricular assist device (BVAD) after recovery of ventricular function at 14 medical centers. All patients were in imminent risk of dying and were selected for VAD support using standard bridge-to-transplant requirements. There were 12 females and 10 males with an average age of 32 (range, 12–49). The etiologies were 12 with myocarditis, 7 with cardiomyopathies (4 post-partum [PPCM], 1 viral [VCM], and 2 idiopathic [IDCM]), and 3 with a combination of myocarditis and cardiomyopathy. BVADs were used in 13 patients and isolated LVADs in 9 patients, for an average duration of 57 days (range, 11–190 days), before return of ventricular function and successful weaning from the device. Post-VAD survival was compared with 43 VAD bridge-to-transplant patients with the same etiologies who underwent cardiac transplantation instead of device weaning.

Results:

Nineteen of the 22 patients are currently alive. Three patients required heart transplantation, 1 within 1 day, 2 at 12 and 13 months post-weaning, and 2 died at 2.5 and 6 months. The remaining 17 patients are alive with their native hearts after an average of 3.2 years (range, 1.2–10 years). The actuarial survival of native hearts (transplant-free survival) post-VAD support is 86% at 1 year and 77% at 5 years, which was not significantly different (p = 0.94) from that of post-VAD transplanted patients, also at 86% and 77%, respectively.

Conclusion:

Long-term survival for bridge-to-recovery with VADs for acute cardiomyopathies and myocarditis is equivalent to that for cardiac transplantation. Recovery of the native heart, which can take weeks to months of VAD support, is the most desirable clinical outcome and should be actively sought, with transplantation used only after recovery of ventricular function has been ruled out.

Section snippets

Methods

The Thoratec VAD voluntary registry database was reviewed for the 10-year period 1990 to 1999. This study included patients who were supported with VADs for severe intractable cardiac failure and who were later weaned from VAD support following recovery of ventricular function. Patients with post-cardiotomy cardiac dysfunction were excluded. Patients with ischemic heart failure were also excluded.

Results

The average VAD support period before the devices could be removed following recovery of ventricular function was 57 days (median, 50 days), with 80% of patients supported for less than 90 days and the shortest and longest duration being 11 and 190 days. All LVADs were removed due to an impression of recovered myocardial function. One right VAD was removed early because of thrombus, but there were no premature removals due to infection. Two VADs were replaced due to mechanical malfunction. The

Discussion

The results of this report show encouraging long-term survival for patients supported with VADs for severe heart failure and then weaned from the device after recovery of ventricular function. The 5-year native heart transplant-free survival of 77% for recovery patients was identical to patient survival 5 years after bridge to cardiac transplantation. Recovery of the natural heart is the preferred clinical outcome, especially for those young patients who otherwise require long-term

Conclusion

These results provide evidence that long-term survival after VAD use as a bridge-to-recovery for acute cardiomyopathies and myocarditis is equivalent to survival for bridging-to-transplantation. Recovery of ventricular function is the most desirable outcome and should be actively sought, especially in patients with short histories of heart failure. Heart transplantation should be used only if sufficient recovery does not occur.

Acknowledgements

The authors thank Gerald Champsaur, MD, from Hôpital Louis Pradel, Lyon, France, Donald Esmore from Alfred Hospital, Melbourne, Australia, J. Donald Hill, MD, from California Pacific Medical Center, San Francisco, James A. Narrod, MD, from Columbia Presbyterian/St. Luke’s Medical Center, Denver, and Mark W. Turrentine, MD, from Riley Hospital for Children, Indianapolis, IN, and also from the surgeons and support staffs at 13 additional medical centers for their help with the transplant group.

References (23)

Cited by (197)

  • Facilitating myocardial recovery

    2019, Mechanical Circulatory Support: A Companion to Braunwald’s Heart Disease
View all citing articles on Scopus
View full text