Original ArticleInfection After Knee Arthroplasty: A Prospective Study of 1509 Cases
Section snippets
Materials and Methods
Prospective data were collected on 1509 consecutive knee arthroplasties performed in our unit in 1349 patients. There were 160 bilateral cases. Data were collected between October 1998 and February 2005.
Patients were reviewed 7 to 10 days preoperatively by an audit nurse at a preassessment clinic. Age, sex, body mass index (BMI), and medical history including diabetes were recorded. American Knee Society scores (AKSS) and the 12-item Short Form Health Survey (SF-12) were used. Patients were
Results
Of the 1509 cases, there were 1390 PFC Sigma (DePuy) TKAs performed through a standard medial parapatellar approach. The patella was resurfaced in only 35 cases (2.5%). The remaining 119 cases were Oxford (Biomet) unicompartment knee arthroplasties.
Follow-up data were available for the majority, with greater than 90% of patients attending follow-up appointments (Table 1).
The overall deep infection rate was 1% (16 cases). The commonest infecting organism was coagulase-negative Staphylococcus in
Discussion
Deep infection after knee arthroplasty is a rare but serious complication with revision often being the end result. Blom et al [6] looked at deep infection rates in 471 primary knee arthroplasties. They found that 7 (77.8%) of their 9 cases of deep infection resulted in revision. A number of patient-related factors have been suggested to increase the risk including hemophilia, diabetes, rheumatoid arthritis, obesity, and poor nutritional state. Many of these reported risk factors are, however,
Conclusion
Using modern orthopedic surgical techniques, we found the infection rate for TKA is not increased in rheumatoid arthritis. A high ASA grade does not increase the risk of infection. Diabetic patients and patients with a BMI greater than 40 kg/m2 have a higher infection rate, which did not reach clinical significance. Superficial infection rarely progresses to deep infection and can be safely treated with appropriate antibiotics, with a good expectation of success.
References (22)
- et al.
The outcome of infected arthroplasty of the knee
J Bone Joint Surg Br
(1986) - et al.
The outcome of total hip and knee arthroplasty in diabetics
Curr Orthop
(2005) - et al.
Obesity and perioperative morbidity in total hip and total knee arthroplasty patients
J Arthroplasty
(2005) - et al.
Total knee arthroplasty in obese patients: a comparison with a matched control group
J Arthroplasty
(2004) - et al.
Obesity and peri-operative morbidity in total hip and total knee arthroplasty patients
J Arthroplasty
(2005) - et al.
Infection rates after 3175 total hip and total knee replacements performed with and without a horizontal unidirectional filtered air-flow system
J Bone Joint Surg Am
(1982) - et al.
Factors influencing the incidence and outcome of infection following total joint arthroplasty
Clin Orthop
(1984) - et al.
Deep sepsis following total knee arthroplasty
J Bone Joint Surg Am
(1986) - et al.
The infected knee arthroplasty: a 6-year follow-up of 357 cases
Acta Orthop Scand
(1991) - et al.
Infection after total knee arthroplasty
J Bone Joint Surg Br
(2004)
Infection in total knee replacement: a retrospective review of 6489 total knee replacements
CORR
Cited by (82)
BMI is a Better Predictor of Periprosthetic Joint Infection Risk Than Local Measures of Adipose Tissue After TKA
2020, Journal of ArthroplastyGeneral Assembly, Prevention, Host Related General: Proceedings of International Consensus on Orthopedic Infections
2019, Journal of ArthroplastyHip and Knee Section, Prevention, Host Related: Proceedings of International Consensus on Orthopedic Infections
2019, Journal of ArthroplastyThe Impact of Diabetes on Patient Outcomes After Total Knee Arthroplasty in an Asian Population
2018, Journal of Arthroplasty
No benefits or funds were received in support of the study.