Elsevier

European Urology

Volume 60, Issue 4, October 2011, Pages 742-750
European Urology

Platinum Priority – Neuro-urology
Editorial by Prokar Dasgupta on pp. 751–752 of this issue
Efficacy and Safety of OnabotulinumtoxinA in Patients with Urinary Incontinence Due to Neurogenic Detrusor Overactivity: A Randomised, Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled Trial

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eururo.2011.07.002Get rights and content

Abstract

Background

Neurogenic detrusor overactivity (NDO) frequently results in urinary incontinence (UI) which impairs quality of life (QOL) and puts the upper urinary tract at risk.

Objective

To assess the effects of onabotulinumtoxinA (BOTOX®, Allergan, Inc.) on UI, urodynamic variables, and QOL in incontinent patients with NDO.

Design, setting, and participants

This multicentre, randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled study enrolled patients with multiple sclerosis (MS; n = 154) or spinal cord injury (SCI; n = 121) with UI due to NDO (≥14 UI episodes per week).

Intervention

Patients received 30 intradetrusor injections of onabotulinumtoxinA 200 U (n = 92), 300 U (n = 91), or placebo (n = 92), avoiding the trigone.

Measurements

Primary end point was change from baseline in UI episodes per week (week 6). Secondary end points included urodynamics (maximum cystometric capacity [MCC], maximum detrusor pressure during first involuntary detrusor contraction [PdetmaxIDC]), and Incontinence Quality of Life (I-QOL) total score. Adverse events (AEs) were assessed.

Results and limitations

At baseline, mean UI episodes per week (33.5) were similar across groups. At week 6, onabotulinumtoxinA 200 U and 300 U significantly reduced UI episodes per week (−21.8 and −19.4, respectively) compared with placebo (−13.2; p < 0.01); onabotulinumtoxinA benefit was observed by the first posttreatment study visit at week 2. Improvements in MCC, PdetmaxIDC, and I-QOL at week 6 were significantly greater with both onabotulinumtoxinA doses than with placebo (p < 0.001). Benefits were observed in both the MS and SCI populations. The median time to patient request for retreatment was the same for both onabotulinumtoxinA doses (42.1 wk) and greater than placebo (13.1 wk; p < 0.001). Most frequent AEs were localised urologic events (urinary tract infections and urinary retention, which were dose related in patients not using clean intermittent catheterisation [CIC] at baseline). Significant increases in postvoid residual were observed in patients not using CIC prior to treatment, and 12%, 30%, and 42% of patients in the placebo, 200-U, and 300-U groups, respectively, initiated CIC posttreatment.

Conclusions

OnabotulinumtoxinA significantly reduced UI and improved urodynamics and QOL in MS and SCI patients with NDO. Both doses were well tolerated with no clinically relevant differences in efficacy or duration of effect between the two doses (http://www.clinicaltrials.gov; NCT00461292).

Introduction

Patients with spinal cord injuries (SCIs) or multiple sclerosis (MS) often have neurogenic detrusor overactivity (NDO). This frequently causes urinary incontinence (UI) and high detrusor pressures, impairing quality of life (QOL) and putting the upper urinary tract at risk [1], [2], [3]. Anticholinergic agents are used as first-line treatment for NDO [4], although patients are often refractory to them, and many patients report adverse systemic effects and are noncompliant [5], [6].

Minimally invasive intradetrusor injections of onabotulinumtoxinA (BOTOX®; Allergan, Inc.) have been shown to improve clinical and urodynamic parameters and QOL in refractory NDO patients in several open-label studies (primarily at a dose of 300 U) [7], [8] and in a small phase 2 placebo-controlled trial [9]. We present the results of the first large, randomised, placebo-controlled trial designed to evaluate the efficacy and safety of onabotulinumtoxinA 200 U and 300 U for the treatment of UI due to NDO.

Section snippets

Study participants

Eligible subjects were 18–80 yr of age with ≥14 UI episodes per week due to NDO from SCI (T1 level or lower and occurring ≥6 mo before screening) or MS (clinically stable for ≥3 mo before screening and an Expanded Disability Status Score ≤6.5) [10]. Patients were not adequately managed by anticholinergic agents (inadequate response or intolerable side effects). Those taking anticholinergics at baseline were to maintain the same regimen throughout the study, and those not taking anticholinergics

Baseline demographic and disease characteristics

A total of 275 patients were randomised: 92 to placebo, 92 to onabotulinumtoxinA 200 U, and 91 to onabotulinumtoxinA 300 U. Of these, 230 patients (83.6%) completed the placebo-controlled treatment cycle 1; only 5 patients (1.8%) discontinued due to AEs (Fig. 1). A total of 137 patients received retreatment, 74 of whom had a repeat onabotulinumtoxinA treatment (200 U followed by 200 U or 300 U followed by 300 U).

At baseline in the overall population (56% MS; 44% SCI), patients reported a mean

Discussion

The primary goals of treatment for NDO are to protect the upper urinary tract by decreasing bladder pressure, reducing incontinence, and improving QOL [12]. The present study demonstrates that significant improvements in these parameters were already achieved at the 200-U dose of onabotulinumtoxinA. In addition to significant reductions in UI, IDCs were absent at week 6 in approximately 60% of patients; and in those patients with an IDC, PdetmaxIDC decreased to levels traditionally considered

Conclusions

OnabotulinumtoxinA 200 U and 300 U significantly reduced incontinence and improved urodynamic parameters and QOL in patients with UI secondary to NDO. No clinically relevant difference in efficacy or duration of effect was observed between the two doses. Both doses of onabotulinumtoxinA were well tolerated, although the 200-U group had a more favourable safety profile.

References (24)

Cited by (0)

View full text