Selected topic: Emergency radiologyImaging Choices in Occult Hip Fracture
Introduction
Diagnosis of hip fractures is particularly important due to the high dependence on the integrity of this structure for people to function in their daily lives. Left unrecognized, patients face increasing morbidity and mortality as time from the original injury lengthens. A delay of just 2 days in surgical treatment for an acute hip fracture doubles mortality (1). In addition, an unrecognized non-displaced fracture may displace, requiring surgery of much higher risk (2). This may be part of the reason that the most frequent lawsuit against Emergency Physicians is for missed orthopedic injury (3).
There are more than 250,000 hip fractures annually in the United States, and that number is increasing as the population ages (4, 5). In fact, a doubling or even tripling of this number is projected by the year 2040 (6). An estimated 15% of the population will have a fracture of the proximal femur by the age of 80 years (7). Not all fractures are obvious clinically or radiographically. Detecting these occult fractures is complicated by the intrinsic limitations of contemporary imaging tools. In practice, a suspicion of hip fracture despite negative X-ray studies usually prompts additional imaging to detect or exclude pathology. Choices include computed tomography (CT), bone scanning, and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI).
In this article we review the literature focused on hip fracture detection and discuss advantages and disadvantages of each major imaging modality. Moreover, we present an evidence-based algorithm for the evaluation of a patient suspected to have an occult hip fracture in the Emergency Department (ED).
Section snippets
Plain Radiography
Imaging typically begins with plain radiography. This will reveal most fractures; however, occult hip fractures are not infrequent. The hip, in particular, is at risk for occult fracture as the proximal femur has a high percentage of trabecular bone, a type of bone in which disruption is more difficult to detect than in cortical bone (2). Figure 1 depicts a radiograph of a patient's hip harboring an occult femoral neck fracture after a fall, whereas Figure 2 shows the same patient who returned
The Patient with Occult Fracture
As the prevalence of occult fracture is significant, determining which patients are at risk for this diagnosis is imperative. Therefore, a physician must determine who belongs in the high- and low-risk groups. This promotes efficient allotment of appropriate imaging and streamlining of resource utilization. The literature gives definition to these groups. A Medline search using various combinations of the search terms “hip,” “femur,” “fracture,” “occult,” and “imaging” produced 17 studies from
Computed Tomography
Computed tomography is readily accessible in the ED and is a chief method of evaluating the multiply injured trauma patient. Addition of the third dimension with CT can often define a fracture when it is not seen on X-ray study, as a two-dimensional X-ray study may not be taken in coincident plane(s) with the fracture(s). However, the same problem is encountered with CT as with plain radiography: resolution of osteoporotic trabecular bone is limited and fracture can lie hidden within. Figure 3
Finding the Occult Hip Fracture
With little support for CT and negative data regarding scintigraphy, the available evidence favors MRI as the diagnostic modality of choice for occult hip fracture. The limited availability in many ED settings to perform MRI underscores the importance of defining low- and high-risk patients to determine appropriate diagnostic methods.
Using available data, we developed an algorithm for patients with hip trauma. A pictorial representation of this algorithm is presented in Figure 5. Clinical
Summary
Hip fracture is a common disease and deserves efficient and precise diagnosis. It has significant morbidity and mortality, which worsens as time from injury progresses. Plain radiographs are usually sufficient for diagnosis as they are at least 90% sensitive for hip fracture. However, in the 3–4% of ED patients having hip X-ray studies who harbor an occult hip fracture, the Emergency Physician must choose among several methods for further evaluation. The right tool is not always easy to pick as
References (51)
- et al.
Orthopedic pitfalls in the ED: radiographically occult hip fracture
Am J Emerg Med
(2002) - et al.
ED evaluation and treatment of hip and thigh injuries
Emerg Med Clin North Am
(2000) - et al.
The role of MRI in the diagnosis of occult hip fractures
Injury
(1998) - et al.
Early diagnosis of occult hip fractures MRI versus CT scan
Injury
(2005) - et al.
Limited magnetic resonance imaging in the diagnosis of occult hip fractures
Am J Emerg Med
(1998) - et al.
The role of MRI in the diagnosis of proximal femoral fractures in the elderly
Injury
(2006) - et al.
Is magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) necessary to exclude occult hip fracture?
Injury
(2007) - et al.
Postoperative complications and mortality associated with operative delay in older patients who have a fracture of the hip
J Bone Joint Surg Am
(1995) - et al.
Early magnetic resonance imaging of radiographically occult osteoporotic fractures of the femoral neck
Hong Kong Med J
(2004) Hip fractures: a worldwide problem today and tomorrow
Bone
(1993)
The future of hip fractures in the United States: numbers, costs, and potential effects of postmenopausal estrogen
Clin Orthop
Pathology
Prevalence of traumatic hip and pelvic fractures in patients with suspected hip fracture and negative initial standard radiographs—a study of ED patients
Acad Emerg Med
What's new in hip fractures?Current concepts
Am J Orthop
Missed hip fractures
Arch Emerg Med
Comparison of MRI with bone scanning for suspected hip fracture in elderly patients
J Bone Joint Surg Br
Limited magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and the occult hip fracture
Ann Acad Med Singapore
The advantages of MRI in the detection of occult hip fractures
Eur Radiol
The use of MRI in the diagnosis of occult hip fractures in the elderly: a preliminary review
Orthopedics
Patterns of injury in patients with radiographic occult fracture of neck of femur as determined by magnetic resonance imaging
Australas Radiol
Age-related reductions in the strength of the femur tested in a fall-loading configuration
J Bone Joint Surg Am
Majority of hip fractures occur as a result of a fall and impact on the greater trochanter of the femur: a prospective controlled hip fracture study with 206 consecutive patients
Calcif Tissue Int
Incidence of hip and other osteoporotic fractures in elderly men and women: Dubbo Osteoporosis Epidemiology Study
J Bone Miner Res
Hip fractures: a practical guide to management
Diagnosis of occult fractures about the hipMagnetic resonance imaging compared with bone-scanning
J Bone Joint Surg Am
Cited by (103)
Fracture of the greater trochanter with occult intertrochanteric fracture in an adult treated by percutaneous screw fixation: Case report of an often missed injury
2023, International Journal of Surgery Case ReportsTrauma in the Aging Population: Geriatric Trauma Pearls
2023, Emergency Medicine Clinics of North AmericaCitation Excerpt :Hip and pelvic fractures are one of the most common traumatic injuries among older adults.122 Plain radiographs have an estimated sensitivity of 90% to 98% for hip fractures and should reveal most fractures.123 However, if there is persistent clinical suspicion despite normal radiographs (eg, pain, inability to ambulate), then further imaging should be pursued to rule out occult fracture.
Musculoskeletal Injuries
2023, The Emergency Department Technician HandbookRadiology report generation for proximal femur fractures using deep classification and language generation models
2022, Artificial Intelligence in MedicineCitation Excerpt :Initially, all patients are subjected to radiographic examination, with both anteroposterior (AP) and axial imaging directions, to classify the fracture according to the AO [6] and Garden standard [7]. As 3–4% of all patients harbour an occult fracture, these examinations may be inconclusive and thus needing further imaging in the form of CT or MR scan to be performed [5,23]. In addition to the identification of the fracture, the correct sub-classification of the fracture according to the AO standard has a significant impact on diagnosis, treatment and prognosis [8].