Clinical Study
Ultrasound-Accelerated Catheter-Directed Thrombolysis for Acute Submassive Pulmonary Embolism

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jvir.2014.12.017Get rights and content

Abstract

Purpose

To evaluate the safety and efficacy of ultrasound-accelerated catheter-directed thrombolysis (USAT) in patients with submassive pulmonary embolism (PE).

Materials and Methods

This retrospective study comprised 45 consecutive patients (15 prospective, 30 retrospective) who underwent USAT for submassive PE from June 2012–May 2014. Inclusion criteria were right ventricular dysfunction (RVD) as indicated by right ventricle-to-left ventricle (RV:LV) ratio > 0.9, symptoms of < 2 weeksʼ duration, and absence of absolute contraindication to thrombolysis. All patients underwent pulmonary artery catheterization with a standardized protocol (24 mg recombinant tissue plasminogen activator). Hemodynamic evaluation immediately after USAT, RV:LV ratio evaluation at 48–72 hours after USAT by computed tomography angiography and echocardiography, and adverse event reporting for a minimum of 30 days were performed. Outcomes and complications are reported as per the Society of Interventional Radiology Reporting Standards for Endovascular Treatment of Pulmonary Embolism.

Results

USAT was technically successful in 100% (n = 45) of patients. Main pulmonary artery pressure significantly decreased from 49.8 mm Hg to 31.1 mm Hg (P < .0001). RVD significantly improved with mean RV:LV ratios decreasing from 1.59 to 0.93 (P < .0001). There were 6 complications: 4 minor bleeding episodes at access sites and 2 major bleeding complications (flank and arm hematoma). All-cause mortality at 30 days was 0%. There were no readmissions for PE at 30 days after discharge.

Conclusions

Ultrasound-accelerated catheter-directed thrombolysis using a standardized low-dose protocol is a safe and efficacious method of treatment of submassive PE to reduce acute pulmonary hypertension and RVD.

Section snippets

Materials and Methods

This study included 45 consecutive patients (25 men and 20 women; mean age, 56.5 y) with submassive PE treated at a single institution from June 2012–May 2014. Demographics are presented in Table 1, and risk factors for venous thromboembolism are listed in Table 2 (25). The first 15 patients were enrolled in a prospective multicenter trial (SEATTLE II [A Prospective, Single-arm, Multi-center Trial of EkoSonic Endovascular System and Activase for Treatment of Acute Pulmonary Embolism],

Results

Endovascular placement of catheters and infusion were technically successful in 100% (n = 45) of patients. There were no complications related to catheter placement (ie, perforation, sustained arrhythmia, dissection). Compared with baseline, main systolic pulmonary artery pressure significantly decreased from 49.8 mm to 31.1 mm, and the difference before and after the procedure was highly statistically significant (18.9 mm; 95% confidence interval, 14.9–22.8 mm, P < .0001). Complete concordance

Discussion

Investigators are working to identify the ideal therapy, one with the lowest potential risk of hemorrhagic complications while decreasing RVD and subsequent mortality, in patients presenting with submassive PE. A recently published European double-blind randomized controlled trial (14) evaluating systemic thrombolysis with a single weight-based bolus of tenecteplase ranging from 30–50 mg versus placebo in intermediate-risk PE revealed a 66% reduction in hemodynamic collapse and all-cause

References (32)

  • W.T. Kuo et al.

    Catheter-directed therapy for the treatment of massive pulmonary embolism: systematic review and meta-analysis of modern techniques

    J Vasc Interv Radiol

    (2009)
  • E.M. Antman et al.

    American College of Cardiology; American Heart Association; Canadian Cardiovascular Society. ACC/AHA guidelines for the management of patients with ST-elevation myocardial infarction-executive summary. A report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on Practice Guidelines

    J Am Coll Cardiol

    (2004)
  • F. Banovac et al.

    Reporting standards for endovascular treatment of pulmonary embolism

    J Vasc Interv Radiol

    (2010)
  • C. Francis et al.

    Ultrasound accelerates transport of recombinant of recombinant tissue plasminogen activator into clots

    Ultrasound Med Biol

    (1995)
  • C. Jerjes Sanchez et al.

    Acute infarct of the right ventricle secondary to a massive pulmonary thromboembolism

    Arch Inst Cardiol Mex

    (1995)
  • A. Ribeiro et al.

    Pulmonary embolism: one-year follow-up with echocardiography Doppler and five-year survival analysis

    Circulation

    (1999)
  • Cited by (52)

    • Navigating the Complexity of High-Risk Pulmonary Embolism—Is Mechanical Thrombectomy the Answer We Need?

      2024, Journal of the Society for Cardiovascular Angiography and Interventions
    • Catheter-based therapy for acute pulmonary embolism: An overview of current evidence

      2022, Archives of Cardiovascular Diseases
      Citation Excerpt :

      The primary endpoint, namely the difference in the right ventricle/left ventricle (RV/LV) ratio from baseline to 24 hours, was significantly improved in the endovascular group compared with heparin alone (0.30 ± 0.20 vs 0.03 ± 0.16; P < 0.001). Several other non-randomized non-comparative studies including patients with haemodynamically unstable PE or haemodynamically stable PE with RV dysfunction have found similar results in terms of improvement in RV function (Fig. 1) [14,20–31]. A meta-analysis of available studies showed an average reduction in systolic pulmonary artery pressure of 15.8 mmHg (95% confidence interval [CI] 12.2–19 mmHg), and a reduction of 34% (95% CI 25–42%) in the RV/LV ratio [32].

    • Antithrombotic Therapy for VTE Disease: Second Update of the CHEST Guideline and Expert Panel Report

      2021, Chest
      Citation Excerpt :

      Given the lack of high-quality evidence, and the endorsement of the prior guidance statement, no evidence-to-decision framework was undertaken for this PICO. Small randomized trials of ultrasound-assisted CDT vs anticoagulation alone revealed more rapid improvement of right ventricular parameters and a low reported risk of procedure-related bleeding, but these studies were small and did not assess patient-important efficacy outcomes.78,93–97 An older randomized trial of 34 patients with massive PE found that infusion of recombinant tissue plasminogen activator into a pulmonary artery as opposed to a peripheral vein did not accelerate thrombolysis, but caused more frequent bleeding at the catheter insertion site.98

    • Meta-Analysis of Catheter Directed Ultrasound-Assisted Thrombolysis in Pulmonary Embolism

      2019, American Journal of Cardiology
      Citation Excerpt :

      Fifty-one studies were excluded after full text review because they did not meet the inclusion criteria of the meta-analysis. Finally, 28 studies were included for quality appraisal and the meta-analysis (Figure 1).5–32 A total of 2,135 patients were included in the 28 included studies.

    View all citing articles on Scopus

    None of the other authors have identified a conflict of interest.

    1

    K.M.S. is a paid consultant for BTG.

    View full text