Editorial

Nephrogenic Fibrosing Dermopathy/Nephrogenic Systemic Fibrosis—Setting the Record Straight

Until 2006, the main considerations regarding safety for all gadolinium-based contrast agents (GBCAs) were related to short-term adverse reactions. However, the administration of certain “high-risk” GBCAs to patients with renal failure resulted in multiple reported cases of nephrogenic systemic fibrosis. Findings have been reported regarding gadolinium deposition within the body and various reports of patients who report suffering from acute and chronic symptoms secondary to GBCA's exposure. At the present state of knowledge, it has been proved that gadolinium deposits also occur in the brain, irrespective of renal function and GBCAs stability class. To date, no definitive clinical findings are associated with gadolinium deposition in brain tissue. Gadolinium deposition disease is a newly described and probably infrequent entity. Patients presenting with gadolinium deposition disease may show signs and symptoms that somewhat follows a pattern similar but not identical, and also less severe, to those observed in nephrogenic systemic fibrosis. In this review, we will address gadolinium toxicity focusing on these 2 recently described concerns.

To describe the clinical manifestations of presumed gadolinium toxicity in patients with normal renal function.

Participants were recruited from two online gadolinium toxicity support groups. The survey was anonymous and individuals were instructed to respond to the survey only if they had evidence of normal renal function, evidence of gadolinium in their system beyond 30 days of this MRI, and no pre-existent clinical symptoms and/or signs of this type.

42 subjects responded to the survey (age: 28–69, mean 49.1 ± 22.4 years). The most common findings were: central pain (n = 15), peripheral pain (n = 26), headache (n = 28), and bone pain (n = 26). Only subjects with distal leg and arm distribution described skin thickening (n = 22). Clouded mentation and headache were the symptoms described as persistent beyond 3 months in 29 subjects. Residual disease was present in all patients. Twenty-eight patients described symptoms following administration of one brand of Gadolinium-Based Contrast Agent (GBCA), 21 after a single GBCA administration and 7 after multiple GBCA administrations, including: gadopentetate dimeglumine, n = 9; gadodiamide, n = 4; gadoversetamide, n = 4; gadobenate dimeglumine, n = 4; gadobutrol, n = 1; gadoteridol, n = 2; and unknown, n = 4.

Gadolinium toxicity appears to arise following GBCA administration, which appears to contain clinical features seen in Nephrogenic Systemic Fibrosis, but also features not observed in that condition.

This article provides a comprehensive literature review regarding side effects both minor and major associated with contrast agent injection. This includes a discussion of nephrogenic systemic fibrosis (NSF), which remains highly topical. Radiographers now commonly are responsible for injection of contrast agent in patients, in keeping with their extended role. Therefore it is incumbent on them to understand the agents they inject, the contra-indications for injection and any potential associated risks, so that they can act and react accordingly in a timely manner. The need for this knowledge was made very evident after the recent death of a patient from anaphylactic shock when there was a delay in mounting the appropriate procedure. This paper represents a synthesis of relevant articles and reflects on the results, before drawing appropriate conclusions particularly those of special relevance to radiographers.

The strong association between nephrogenic systemic fibrosis (NSF) and exposure to gadolinium-based contrast agents (GBCAs) has greatly affected the care of patients with kidney disease. NSF has been reported in patients with ESRD, CKD, and acute kidney injury (AKI). The majority of cases have occurred in patients with ESRD, but about 20% have been reported in patients with AKI or CKD stages 4 and 5. There is also a risk difference among GBCAs, with the Food and Drug Administration contraindicating 3 linear agents in patients at risk. Given the significant morbidity and mortality of NSF, it is imperative to identify individuals at risk. Although there are no data to support a role for hemodialysis (HD) in reducing the risk for NSF after administration of GBCAs, immediate HD is still recommended within 2 hours. Patients maintained on peritoneal dialysis seem to be at high risk and immediate HD is also recommended. However, this is not the current recommendation for CKD stages 4 and 5, especially with suspected lower risk of noncontraindicated agents. Individualized assessment is important and especially in those patients close to dialysis initiation. Instituting policies is important to address the imaging needs of patients with CKD and AKI while ensuring a balance between benefits and risks.

Gadolinium (Gd) has been traditionally used as a non-nephrotoxic alternative to iodinated contrast for digital subtraction angiography (DSA) in patients with chronic renal insufficiency. However, its use has been questioned on the basis of reports of nephrotoxicity and its recent association with nephrogenic systemic fibrosis (NSF), a potentially lethal complication. Recently available data are conflicting with respect to the true safety profile of intra-arterial Gd. The purpose of this study was to examine the risk of contrast nephropathy and NSF after Gd exposure in a large population of azotemic patients undergoing DSA.

A comprehensive database encompassing data on all patients who underwent DSA between June 2003 and December 2007 at the New York Presbyterian Hospital was retrospectively reviewed. Patients receiving Gd either alone or in combination with iodinated contrast during DSA were identified and further analyzed. Acute renal failure (ARF) was defined as an elevation in serum creatinine (Cr) by >0.5 mg/dL within 48 hours of exposure. Clinical follow-up was conducted through chart reviewing as well as telephonic interviews with patients and their primary care physicians.

A total of 153 patients underwent 179 exposures to Gd either alone (33%) or in combination (67%) with iodinated contrast. Mean follow-up duration was 27.1 months. The mean Cr level was 1.94 ± 0.78 mg/dL and 1.96 ± 1.1 mg/dL before and after DSA, respectively. There were 20 (11.2%) instances of ARF. The mean Cr level before DSA was higher in patients who developed ARF versus those in the non-ARF group (2.7 ± 1.1 mg/dL vs. 1.9 ± 0.7 mg/dL, p = 0.004). In the ARF group, 12 patients had a return to baseline renal function, four experienced irreversible renal deterioration, and four needed dialysis (4.5% incidence of irreversible renal failure). There were 19 deaths at the time of this study (12.4%). The highest risk for the development of ARF after Gd exposure occurred in patients with Cr levels of >3.0 mg/dL before DSA and in those receiving >0.4 mmol/kg of Gd. For patients who received iodinated contrast in combination with Gd, there was a trend toward a higher risk for developing ARF as compared with those receiving only Gd. Finally, there were no instances of NSF identified in any of the patients who received intra-arterial Gd.

Although Gd has the potential to cause kidney injury similar to iodinated contrast, the risk of irreversible renal failure and the requirement for dialysis is low. Life- or limb-threatening interventions should not be avoided in this patient cohort because of preexisting elevations in Cr. These data should help guide the use of Gd in patients with chronic renal insufficiency.