Donor Testing and Risk: Current Prevalence, Incidence, and Residual Risk of Transfusion-Transmissible Agents in US Allogeneic Donations

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tmrv.2011.07.007Get rights and content

Over the past 20 years, there has been a major increase in the safety of the blood supply, as demonstrated by declining rates of posttransfusion infection and reductions in estimated residual risk for such infections. Reliable estimates of residual risk have been possible within the American Red Cross system because of the availability of a large amount of reliable and consistent data on donations and infectious disease testing results. Among allogeneic blood donations, the prevalence rates of infection markers for hepatitis C virus (HCV) and hepatitis B virus have decreased over time, although rates for markers of human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) and human T-cell lymphotropic virus did not. The incidence (/100 000 person-years) of HIV and HCV among repeat donors showed apparent increases from 1.55 and 1.89 in 2000 through 2001 to 2.16 and 2.98 in 2007 through 2008. These observed fluctuations confirm the need for continuous monitoring and evaluation. The residual risk of HIV, HCV, and human T-cell lymphotropic virus among all allogeneic donations is currently below 1 per 1 million donations, and that of hepatitis B surface antigen is close to 1 per 300 000 donations.

Section snippets

Demography of Donor Populations

In 2008, a total of 3 830 094 volunteer blood donors successfully made 6 638 877 blood donations to ARC Blood Services, with whole blood and apheresis components accounting for approximately 89% and 11% of the collections, respectively. Females accounted for approximately half (50.1%) of the successful donors, although they contributed slightly fewer (48.6%) of the successful donations. Repeat donors accounted for 74% of all donors and 81.9% of total donations. Female donors aged 16 to 24

Infectious Disease Marker Prevalence Among Blood Donations

Prevalence reflects the number of confirmed-positive donations as determined for a given transfusion-transmissible agent over the total number of donations tested. Prevalence among first-time donations reflects the rate of an infection among the population of eligible individuals who have never undergone blood donation testing; comparison with prevalence rates for the overall population defines the impact of donor self-deferral and donor-eligibility selection. Prevalence among repeat donations

Incidence and Window-Period Risk Among Repeat Donors

The incidence of transfusion-transmissible agents among blood donors is the number of observed new infections over the total number of person-years observed (properly termed incidence density). In the past, incidence was determined by evaluation of data from repeat donors only, but now, methods have been developed to estimate incidence for first-time donors.

Table 3 presents incidence density data observed among repeat allogeneic blood donors to ARC in 2007 to 2008 along with residual risk

Overall Incidence and Window-Period Risk Estimates

A single-sample method for estimation of incidence among first-time donors allows incidence and residual risk to be estimated for all donations. A “detuned” or less sensitive assay was developed for HIV infection, although no such assays have yet been widely used for other infections. Implementation of NAT for viral RNA (HIV RNA and HCV RNA) and thus the availability of 2 tests indicative of different stages of an infection (anti-HIV and HIV RNA or anti-HCV and HCV RNA) made it possible to

Estimated Residual Risks Versus Observed Transfusion Transmissions

Estimated residual risks do not necessarily reflect the actual number of transfusion transmissions to recipients. In fact, only the original observations on HIV window-period risk were based on transfusion-transmitted infections [17]. Residual risk estimates have been continuously updated based on measures of test sensitivity. However, the window periods used in this review are based on viral doubling periods and assumed infectious doses. Other factors contribute to the lack of reported

Acknowledgment

Edward P. Notari IV and Fatemeh Musavi managed the ARCNET database and provided the unpublished data in this review.

References (63)

  • S.L. Stramer et al.

    Detection of HIV-1 and HCV infections among antibody-negative blood donors by nucleic acid–amplification testing

    N Engl J Med

    (2004)
  • S.L. Stramer et al.

    Effectiveness of human T-lymphotropic virus (HTLV) recipient tracing (lookback) and the current HTLV-I and -II confirmatory algorithm, 1999 to 2004

    Transfusion

    (2006)
  • S.L. Stramer et al.

    HTLV antibody screening of blood donors: rates of false positive results and evaluation of a potential donor re-entry algorithm

    Transfusion

    (2011)
  • S. Zou et al.

    Current incidence and residual risk of hepatitis B infection among blood donors in the United States

    Transfusion

    (2009)
  • S. Zou et al.

    Current value of serologic test for syphilis as a surrogate marker for bloodborne viral infections among blood donors in the United States

    Transfusion

    (2009)
  • S. Zou et al.

    Prevalence, incidence and residual risk of HIV and HCV infections among US blood donors since the introduction of nucleic acid testing

    Transfusion

    (2010)
  • S. Zou et al.

    Prevalence, incidence and residual risk of major blood borne infections among apheresis collections to the American Red Cross Blood Services, 2004-2008

    Transfusion

    (2010)
  • S.L. Stramer et al.

    Strategies for testing blood donors for West Nile virus

    Transfusion

    (2006)
  • Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC)

    Blood donor screening for Chagas disease—United States, 2006-2007

    MMWR

    (2007)
  • Y. Wu et al.

    Direct assessment of cytomegalovirus transfusion-transmitted risks after universal leukoreduction

    Transfusion

    (2010)
  • J.J. Korelitz et al.

    A method for estimating hepatitis B virus incidence rates in volunteer blood donors

    Transfusion

    (1997)
  • L.R. Petersen et al.

    Duration of time from onset of human immunodeficiency virus type 1 infectiousness to development of detectable antibody

    Transfusion

    (1994)
  • G.B. Schreiber et al.

    The risk of transfusion-transmitted viral infections. The Retrovirus Epidemiology Donor Study

    N Engl J Med

    (1996)
  • M.P. Busch et al.

    A new strategy for estimating risks of transfusion-transmitted viral infections based on rates of detection of recently infected donors

    Transfusion

    (2005)
  • S.H. Kleinman et al.

    Assessing the impact of HBV NAT on window period reduction and residual risk

    J Clin Virol

    (2006)
  • A. Manns et al.

    A prospective study of transmission by transfusion of HTLV-I and risk factors associated with seroconversion

    Int J Cancer

    (1992)
  • S.L. Orton et al.

    Prevalence of circulating Treponema pallidum DNA and RNA in blood donors with confirmed-positive syphilis tests

    Transfusion

    (2002)
  • L.M. Katz

    A test that won't die: the serologic test for syphilis

    Transfusion

    (2009)
  • B.C. Dow et al.

    Syphilis nucleic acid testing: usefulness in syphilis confirmation?

    Transfusion

    (2010)
  • S.F. O'Brien et al.

    Current incidence and estimated residual risk of transfusion-transmitted infections in donations made to Canadian Blood Services

    Transfusion

    (2007)
  • L.N. Pealer et al.

    West Nile Virus Transmission Investigation Team. Transmission of West Nile virus through blood transfusion in the United States in 2002

    N Engl J Med

    (2003)
  • Cited by (149)

    • Transfusion Reactions and Adverse Events

      2021, Clinics in Laboratory Medicine
    • A Comparison of Transfusion-Related Adverse Reactions Among Apheresis Platelets, Whole Blood-Derived Platelets, and Platelets Subjected to Pathogen Reduction Technology as Reported to the National Healthcare Safety Network Hemovigilance Module

      2021, Transfusion Medicine Reviews
      Citation Excerpt :

      Historically, human immunodeficiency virus (HIV), hepatitis B virus (HBV), and hepatitis C virus (HCV) infections were of great concern as transfusion-transmissible infections. However, with the adoption of nucleic acid testing (NAT) of donors and rigorous donor selection, the risk of HIV, HBV, or HCV transmission through transfusion has dramatically decreased, with no reported transmissions through transfusion in the United States since 2014 [11-13]. However, sepsis due to bacterial contamination of platelets continues to be a significant threat to recipient safety [14].

    • HTLV-1 and blood donation

      2024, British Journal of Haematology
    View all citing articles on Scopus
    View full text