Alleged resection of the vas deferens: Medicolegal implications*

https://doi.org/10.1016/S0022-3468(88)80532-3Get rights and content

New York state law requires that significant complications be reported by telephone within 24 hours, followed by a full written report within five days with the names of the alleged involved physicians. This case illustrates the potential medicolegal consequences following the mandated immediate nonsubstantiated report of an alleged bilateral vas deferens injury during a bilateral inguinal herniorrhaphy in a 7-month-old male. Review of the surgical pathologic specimen showed that both hernial sacs did indeed contain segments of vas deferens structures, which based on the findings at reexploration, were consistent with duplication or embryonic remnants of the vas deferens. The vas deferens was found to be normal and uninjured bilaterally. The legal ramifications remain unclear. Since there is no clear cut method to retract the allegation, the physician's profile may be permanently damaged.

References (13)

There are more references available in the full text version of this article.

Cited by (25)

  • Duplicated vas deferens incidentally discovered during orchiopexy

    2022, Journal of Pediatric Surgery Case Reports
  • Unilateral complet duplication of the vas deferens: Cadaveric case report

    2017, Journal of the Anatomical Society of India
    Citation Excerpt :

    The diagnosis of duplication of the VD can be made by physical examination, however such a rare anomaly is not readily suspected, and therefore, rarely diagnosed during a routine physical examination.2 The duplication of the VD is most commonly identified during some urogenital surgical procedures such as vasectomy and varicocelectomy or during an inguinal hernia repair.2–25 The recognition and interpretation of this anomaly is important to avoid iatrogenic injury to the VD during surgery as well as to prevent an ineffective vasectomy.

  • Proximally Directed Double-looped Epididymis and Vas Deferens Simulating Vas Duplication: The Importance of Precise Definition of Abnormal Ductal Anatomy in Cryptorchidism

    2016, Urology
    Citation Excerpt :

    Failure to recognize and to accurately define these abnormalities could result in transection of the ductal system at either end during orchidopexy, especially when the vas had already been “identified previously” during the mobilization. Furthermore, the appearance of two tubular ductal structures is a likely explanation for at least some previous reports of vas duplication.24-28 These unusual cases of proximal extension and looping reemphasize the importance of recognizing and diagnosing fully the precise anatomy of abnormal ductal structures encountered in association with cryptorchid testes.

View all citing articles on Scopus
*

Presented at the 18th Annual Meeting of the American Pediatric Surgical Association, Hilton Head Island, South Carolina, May 6–9, 1987.

1

From the Division of Pediatric Surgery, Departments of Surgery and Pathology, Downstate Medical Center, Kings County Hospital, State University of New York, Brooklyn.

View full text