Introduction
Society of Interventional Radiology Clinical Practice Guidelines

https://doi.org/10.1097/01.RVI.0000094584.83406.3eGet rights and content

Section snippets

TYPES OF DOCUMENTS

Quality Improvement Guidelines are systematically developed, evidence-based, consensus documents including definitions, indications, efficacy, success, and complication thresholds that assist medical decision-making (2). Guidelines define an optimal level of patient care and are used to reduce variation in clinical practice between individual physicians or groups of physicians, thus raising the standard of care. Guidelines also assist physicians and other health care providers in managing the

METHODOLOGY EMPLOYED

There is increasing concern about the quality, reliability, and independence of practice guidelines (5). In the article by Grilli et al, quality of specialty society guidelines was assessed based on the type of professionals and stakeholders involved in the development process, the strategy to identify primary evidence, and an explicit grading of recommendations according to the quality of supporting evidence (5). The earliest of the SIR standards documents were written by simple consensus.

Quality Improvement

Quality improvement documents have been created for many procedures. An institution may choose to focus on selected procedures to analyze outcomes. While practicing physicians should strive to achieve perfect outcomes (eg, 100% success, 0% complications), in practice all physicians will fall short of this ideal to a variable extent. Thus indicator thresholds may be used to assess the efficacy of ongoing quality improvement programs. For the purposes of these guidelines, a threshold is a

CONCLUSION

The purpose of the SIR standards is to improve the quality of patient care. Reporting standards allow research to be reported accurately so that we can reliably determine how well IR procedures work and how they compare to outcomes from other procedures. Credentialing standards provide a guide to appropriate training so that physicians can achieve outcomes in their practice comparable to those reported in the literature. Quality improvement standards allow outcomes to be measured in a practice

First page preview

First page preview
Click to open first page preview

Cited by (1372)

View all citing articles on Scopus
View full text